- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 22:39:18 -0500
- To: "GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Charles wrote: Summary: There are cases where a checkpoint must be marked not applicable, since meeting the checkpoint would contradict the purpose of some content. We should provide examples of where this makes sense, and where it does not. GV: Thanks Charles for this format (summary first). Very helpful So do we a) list specifically those conditions under which conformance can be achieved by just saying that some checkpoints are N/A or b) leave it up to the authors to decide when they can ignore a checkpoint and still claim conformance or c) something else ? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2001 23:39:47 UTC