- From: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:24:05 +1100
- TO: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-Id: <H00000e000246561.1005729845.tux.sofcom.com.au@MHS>
Just catching up on my email! I think it is very important that we consider people's financial ability as well as any dis-abilities. This is why I test on different OS/browsers even though this isn't explicit in the guidelines. This is also why I have some reservations on the first set of conformance points (OTACS), because I think it requires people to have certain technologies and leads us down the garden path of "this site works best on IE 5.0" And before I initiate a flame war I would like to say that I have been sick and haven't managed to read all the emails so if this issue has been dealt with I apologise. See you tomorrow at OzeWAI. Gian -----Original Message----- From: GV [mailto:GV@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:05 PM To: w3c-wai-gl Subject: Assistive TEchnology levels? In looking at the topic of AT it occurs to me that we might have different levels of AT and ability to use technology Perhaps we have three levels 1 - the ability to Access using any existing tools 2 - the ability to Access using standard browsers and moderately priced AT. (less than $300 ??) 3 - the ability to Access using browsers and AT in their default settings. (this last one is added since most people don’t know how to custom configure their software) Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 04:23:57 UTC