- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 08:10:36 -0700
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, Graham Oliver <graham_oliver@yahoo.com>, gian@stanleymilford.com.au
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 2:22 PM -0400 2001/10/26, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >This is a good question. I think this is how I see it: >1. the CHECKPOINTS describe how to make content accessible for >people with disabilities >2. the PRIORITIES help the content provider determine where to start. You are correct except for one word. This is more accurate: "the PRIORITIES help the content provider determine where to STOP." This is a true and accurate statement of how WCAG 1.0 priority levels are used, and it is a danger to increased accessibility -- and therefore I feel it is a problem we _must_ correct in WCAG 2.0. >Every checkpoint should help make content more accessible. Ideally >a content provider would conform to all of them. However, a list of >ten is easier for the content provider to swallow than a list of 21. >We don't want to overwhelm them or they won't do anything. This isn't necessarily true. 21 is not necessarily "too many." It all depends on organization and presentation. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2001 12:11:00 UTC