- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:11:30 -0800
- To: "Cynthia Shelly" <cyns@microsoft.com>, <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 2:47 PM -0800 12/6/01, Cynthia Shelly wrote: >I don't think it actually matters that a guideline is objective, as long >as it is testable. I think Gregg's original definition is a long way >towards a definition of "testable". I agree. I am fine with "testable", and I don't think "objective" is as important of a concept. My objections vanish entirely if the previous discussion is revised to say "here is our definition for 'testable'." --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 00:03:40 UTC