- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 01:28:29 -0500 (EST)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- cc: "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
So how do we define "knowledge of the relevant tech and test methods"? i.e. how do people qualify to have their opinions considered or not in weighing up whether 80% agree? cheers Charles On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: At the telecon meeting today we reached consensus on the following definition for objective. If 80% or more of people who have knowledge of the relevant tech and test methods would agree in their judgment This is what we would use to test our guidelines or components for objectivity. It is posted here for comment. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu> -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 30 November 2001 01:28:29 UTC