- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:02:25 -0800
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Kynn, Aside from having some problems with the specific PDF modules you included, there is a lot I like about this approach. However, I'm a bit confused about the relationship between general modules and technology specific modules. For instance, you included both a module on abbreviations and on HTML abbreviations, with a dependency noted. Is that the way to indicate a module which is a technology-specific implementation of a more general requirement? This seems to be a slightly different relationship than, say, the Strict HTML's dependency on Valid HTML. This also seems to scatter technology-specific requirements, rather than gathering them together in one place so someone using that technology can be sure to catch all the requirements, and someone who isn't using a specific technology can ignore the related requirements. But this may just be a problem of presentation, not of content. Loretta
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 14:03:05 UTC