RDFa Subject-Object Variables Determination
Telecon next week...
do we need a test for that?
Updated the primer
Setting [typed resource] when {@rel | @rev} - RDFa Core 1.1, Section 7.5, Step 6
Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera.
- Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera.
- Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera.
- Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera.
- Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera.
Introduction
any23 RDFa test suite results
Fwd: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples
- Re: Fwd: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples
- Re: Fwd: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples
- Re: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples
Getting Started w/ RDFa
Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131
- Re: Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131
- Re: Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131
Made a thorough update on the RDFa primer...
Updated EARL results
On test #286 Re: pyRdfa passes all the HTML5 tests again:-)
HTML5 support for <time> element.
clj-rdfa passes all base RDFa 1.1 tests
Browsing Test Cases on rdfa.info
RDFa Telecons during CR Phase
Re: Official Response to ISSUE-132 from RDF Web Apps WG
Re: Official Response to ISSUE-130 from RDF Web Apps WG
Additional test requirements
Preliminary EARL report
- Re: Preliminary EARL report
- Re: Preliminary EARL report
- Re: Preliminary EARL report
CR has been published...
JSON-LD dump of RDFa test manifest
Test suite caching problem
Should @datetime generate a plain literal with language?
New Heartbeat WD for HTML+RDFa 1.1
Some changes on the test cases for HTML5
'license' term?
Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals...
Test #113 with HTML5
HTML5 test cases and the lang attributes
test #236 and HTML5
A temporary issue with the test harness
Updated some tests...
ISSUE-133 (about, typeof, and property): Processing step missing when @property, @typeof, and @about are on the same element [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments]
Re: RDFa Test Suite EARL reports
Error in test or error in spec?
- Re: Error in test or error in spec?
- Re: Error in test or error in spec?