W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Preliminary EARL report

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:28:57 -0400
To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-rdfa-wg WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FA3DFB08-7254-44ED-A1B4-104DF1BB5059@greggkellogg.net>
On Mar 14, 2012, at 8:28 AM, Niklas Lindström wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>> On 03/14/2012 04:28 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>> 
>>> As I said, I believe all these are really minor issues only. All in
>>> all, it looks great!
> 
> Indeed!
> 
>> Yes, all of this is really great stuff. I'm very impressed with the
>> report generation, Gregg. It shows how HTML+RDFa, TURTLE, and JSON-LD
>> all work together to generate the final document. I think you should
>> definitely blog about how you accomplished this feat. I think many
>> people continue to be confused about how all this technology works together.
> 
> Absolutely, this is very nice to see (and shows the power of a
> consistent data model across different serializations).
> 
>> Also, we landed our CR exit criteria (thanks to Ivan and Gregg) two days
>> after we entered CR. I think we should make some noise about this - blog
>> post at W3C Semantic Web blog? Ivan? I can write the blog post.
>> 
>> Let me know if there are any objections before 4pm EDT today, if not,
>> I'll post something about it.
> 
> I'm happy to report that clj-rdfa [1] now passes 97% of the tests
> (XHTML5, XML and SVG). I have some problems with the test runner which
> I'll dive into tonight, but I'm truly on the verge of a fully
> compliant implementation.
> 
> My problems are related to multilines, and these tests pass if I run
> them manually using ARQ [2].

Do you think the SPARQL is wrong, or that the processor isn't interpreting this properly? Send me your result output and I'll check it out.

> Other than that, my implementation only
> fails on Test 0198 [3], which is missing an @xmlns. That may be a bug
> in the test though?

Yes, I think it is. I'll look at that.

Gregg

> I'll get to working through the test suite itself (especially my
> action 113) in earnest as soon as I've sorted this out.
> 
> (FWIW, the core algorithm is roughly 350 lines of Clojure, not
> counting some 300 LOC of context, DOM implementation and triple
> specific code in other modules.)
> 
> Best regards,
> Niklas
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa
> [2]: http://incubator.apache.org/jena/documentation/query/index.html
> [3]: http://rdfa.info/test-suite/test-cases/rdfa1.1/xhtml5/0198.xhtml
> 
> 
>> -- manu
>> 
>> --
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched
>> http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
>> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 17:29:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:30 UTC