- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:53:29 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Note that any23 passes only about 55% of RDFa 1.1 test cases, so the ability to process documents include @prefix is probably dubious. Gregg On Mar 24, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Shane, > > can you check that? If true, we should formally add it as a formal issue tombe handled when we are out of CR. This is obviously an editorial issue.. > > Ivan > > --- > Ivan Herman > Tel:+31 641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net > > (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Ben Companjen" <ben@companjen.name> >> Date: 24 March 2012 16:19:33 CET >> To: ivan@w3.org,ben@adida.net >> Subject: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples >> >> Dear Mr Adida and Mr Herman, >> >> I discovered that the example CURIES in section 2.2 of the RDFa Core 1.1 Candidate Recommendation do not conform to the definition later in the document. The examples have spaces between the namespace prefix + ":" and the namespace URI, whereas the definition only has a colon. >> >> I found out because the XSLT stylesheet in the Any23 project that extracts triples from HTML+RDFa documents does not expect those spaces, but the RDFaCE Lite editor put them in my blog post and the examples support it (hence I didn't understand why Sindice wouldn't correctly extract namespaces from the post). Only after changing the stylesheet I looked at the definition of CURIES and found out they weren't supposed to be there. >> >> Could you look at this and update the specification? >> >> Thank you in advance. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ben Companjen >> >> >>
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 20:54:15 UTC