- From: Grant Robertson <grantsr@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:35:43 -0700
- To: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADig+f0aTPf8dzxGCBL8KLwMPr=drNo6v14SaE2MNNLN1SL=xw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello All, My name is Grant Robertson. I have been asked by Manu Sporny and Ivan Herman to write some supporting documentation for the RDFa spec. Not because I am an expert in RDFa but because I am just learning it and also happen to be a pretty decent - though not professional - technical writer. For examples of my technical writing you can take a look at http://www.ideationizing.com/search/label/TechnicalWriting. This particular post ( http://www.ideationizing.com/2011/03/ocr-acrobat-pdf-with-renderable-text.html) has turned out to be incredibly popular with users of Adobe Acrobat. Finally, I wrote every word of the the Distributable Educational Material Markup Language web site (www.demml.org), except the "Lorum Ipsum" parts (I keep meaning to fix that...). Speaking of which: I come to RDFa via an odd path. When I first invented the Distributable Educational Material Markup Language (DEMML), though I had been a network manager, I had barely heard of XML. I did some research and taught myself everything I needed to know. I became interested in RDFa as a means to add additional metadata embedded within the actual content to mark up specific phrases or quotes within said content. Recently, I watched a TED talk by Michael Nielsen about making research data - and collaboration between researchers - more open and available. That is when I thought of dSRCI ( http://www.ideationizing.com/2012/02/dsrci-distributed-scientific-research.html) which will utterly depend upon RDFa. So, that is when I really dug into the RDFa spec and tried to learn it. To help myself with this, I started working on a diagram to show what attributes can be used with what other attributes in which circumstances. But I had trouble understanding certain things in the spec (the old 2008 documents) so I tried to join the mailing list. I ran into problems because the old list is dead and - by hook and by crook - I ended up in contact with Manu, Ivan, and Sandro and suggested a rewrite of certain sections of the old documentation (completely unaware that you had been working on new documents for the past four years). So, I guess the timing was just right on both ends. Manu and Ivan say the project really needs a good technical writer just now, and I am trying to build a name for myself so that people will listen to me when I talk about DEMML and dSRCI (plus better job opportunities wouldn't hurt). You will find me to be polite but blunt. I don't beat around the bush when I think something needs to be fixed. However, I am also able to cede to authority when necessary or appropriate without getting my feelings hurt. I have several technical questions about the spec, which I will be posting to the list over the coming week. Once I "fully grok" the spec, I will start working on various supporting documents. The first will be a glossary of terms and an outline of what topics need to be covered. Please keep in mind, I am not suggesting that the documents I write become part of the specifications. These will merely be supporting documents to help people understand the spec. I look forward to working with everyone here. Sincerely, Grant S. Robertson grantsr@gmail.com 520-271-5019 www.demml.org www.ideationizing.com
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 08:05:11 UTC