W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Should @datetime generate a plain literal with language?

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:43:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnGJm62OG_HOO8g3T92C5c2eC7y3b=9HVLqkgRqDtG+GyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
3.1 Additional RDFa Processing Rules includes this:

a plain literal must be generated with the associated language of the node,
> if available.


I don't remember the discussion (was there any?) where the language bit was
discussed. but considering that the content of @datetime is most likely
machine readable data (even if not one of the xsd types), I'm not sure it
would be localized. My gut feeling is that it should just be a plain
literal with no language. Is there a reason here to have a language?

the next step for @value for example does not include such language
consideration.

Steph.


On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> A new HTML+RDFa 1.1 heartbeat working draft has been prepped for release
> for this coming Thursday.
>
> The document is here:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/**drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-**20120315/<http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-20120315/>
>
> Diff-mark from the previous LCWD is here:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/**drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-**
> 20120315/diff-20110525.html<http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-20120315/diff-20110525.html>
>
> This document includes substantitive changes and will thus require a
> second Last Call.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/**02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/<http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2012 04:43:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:30 UTC