- From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:51:07 +0100
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
I may be late for the call, but I will attempt not to be. Steven On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:08:47 +0100, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The purpose of the call this week will be to decide if we want to take > the current Editors Drafts for RDFa Core 1.1, RDFa Lite 1.1, and > XHTML+RDFa 1.1 to Candidate Recommendation. > > Below is the preliminary agenda for our telecon. If you have any > additions or modifications to the agenda, please send them to the > mailing list or mention them on the telecon before we get started. > > ========== > Thursday, March 1st, 2012 > Time: 1500 UTC, 7am San Francisco, 10am Boston, 3pm London > W3C Zakim bridge, telecon code: RDFA (7332) > SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org > Phone US: +1.617.761.6200 > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa > Duration: 60 minutes > Scribe: Gregg, Shane, Ivan, Ted, Steven, Niklas > ========== > > Agenda > ------ > > 1. Any remaining issues? > * ISSUE-121 > * http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/121 > * > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Jan/0097.html > 2. Take RDFa 1.1 to Candidate Recommendation > * The RDFa Core 1.1 Spec: > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-core-20120223/ > * The RDFa Lite 1.1 Spec: > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/WD-rdfa-lite-20120227/ > * The XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Spec: > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-xhtml-rdfa-20120223/ > 3. Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria > * At least two interoperable implementations against the test suite > 4. Any other issues for Candidate Recommendation? > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/ >
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 13:51:46 UTC