[CLOSED] Re: [CLOSED] Re: BASE absolute IRIs
[Closed] Re: [Ok?] Re: SPARQL Protocol comments (editorial)
[CLOSED] Re: BASE absolute IRIs
[CLOSED] Re: Broad application of CSS hypertext pseudo-classes (as to SPARQL "link" elements)
[CLOSED] Re: Common variables across multiple optional blocks [OK?]
[closed] Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?]
[closed] Re: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases [OK?]
[CLOSED] Re: Small comment on rdf-sparql-xmlres and CSS styling
[CLOSED] Re: SPARQL and Unicode versions
[closed]: Protocol erratum
[closed]: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol
[Fwd: SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments]
[OK?]
[OK?] Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS
[OK?] Re: [comments] typo and general
[OK?] Re: [Fwd: SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments]
[OK?] Re: BASE absolute IRIs
[OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document
[OK?] Re: Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation
[OK?] Re: Minor editorial issues for WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914
[OK?] Re: minor technical on 11.2.1 Invocation
[OK?] Re: Protocol erratum
[OK?] Re: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol
[OK?] Re: Section 3 of SPARQL protocol partially out of scope.
[OK?] Re: SPARQL and Unicode versions
[OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples
[OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: BASE IRI resolution
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: Error handling
- Kendall Clark (Monday, 30 January)
- Dan Connolly (Monday, 30 January)
- Kendall Clark (Monday, 30 January)
- Kendall Clark (Monday, 30 January)
- Dan Connolly (Monday, 30 January)
- Kendall Clark (Monday, 30 January)
- Dan Connolly (Monday, 30 January)
- Kendall Clark (Sunday, 29 January)
- Kendall Clark (Sunday, 29 January)
- Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)
- Dan Connolly (Sunday, 29 January)
- Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)
- Dan Connolly (Sunday, 29 January)
- Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: format based on Unicode?
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named
[Ok?] Re: Wrong SOAP namespace
[OK] Re: Protocol erratum
[public-rdf-dawg-comments] <none>
Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards [OK?]
Common variables across multiple optional blocks
Common variables across multiple optional blocks [OK?]
disjunction, query language, data representation ... [closed]
editorial comments on SPARQL Query Lanuage for RDF
Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation
HTTP response code discussion
HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused [OK?]
inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?]
Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases
Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases [OK?]
langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests
Major technical comment: identifier length
major technical: blank nodes
major technical: blank nodes [OK?]
major technical: dateTime arithmetic
major technical: dateTime arithmetic [OK?]
major technical: no aggregates
major technical: no aggregates [OK?]
major technical: no privilege model
major technical: no privilege model [OK?]
major technical: no subqueries
major technical: no subqueries [OK?]
major technical: orthogonality
major technical: orthogonality (expressions in SELECT, ORDER BY) [OK?]
major technical: runaway queries
major technical: semantics are poorly specified
major technical: underspecified errors
minor technical comment on 2.1.3 Syntax of variables
minor technical comment on 2.1.3 Syntax of variables [OK?]
minor technical comments on A.4 Comments
minor technical comments on A.4 Comments [OK?]
minor technical on 10.1 Solution sequences and result forms
minor technical on 10.2 Selecting variables
minor technical on 10.2 Selecting variables [OK?]
minor technical on 10.3 Constructing an output graph
minor technical on 10.4.3 Description of resources
minor technical on 10.4.3 Description of resources [OK?]
minor technical on 11.2.1 Invocation
minor technical on 11.2.2 Effective boolean value
minor technical on 5.4 Optional matching - formal definition
minor technical on 9 Specifying RDF datasets
minor technical on A.3 Keywords
minor technical on A.3 Keywords [OK?]
minor technical: A.7 grammar, rule [25] Constraint
minor technical: are periods separators or terminators?
minor technical: are periods separators or terminators? [OK?]
minor technical: are variable names case insensitive?
minor technical: are variable names case insensitive? [OK?]
minor technical: omissions from Appendix B Conformance
Protocol erratum
QName production in SPARQL grammar [OK?]
Questions on the Sparql
SPARQL and Unicode versions
SPARQL DESCRIBE (Personal comments)
SPARQL DESCRIBE (Personal comments) [OK?] [objection]
sparql describe - options?!
sparql describe - options?! [OK?]
SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [CLOSED]
SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [OK?]
SPARQL: incorrect/confusing example in 9.3
SPARQL: incorrect/confusing example in 9.3 [CLOSED]
SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance
Suspicious mismatch between SPARQL grammar rules and examples
Suspicious mismatch between SPARQL grammar rules and examples [OK?]
Suspicious notation in SPARQL lexical rule for STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 [OK?]
URI serialization issues
- Andreas Sewe (Friday, 20 January)
- Mark Baker (Thursday, 19 January)
- Dan Connolly (Thursday, 19 January)
- Kendall Clark (Thursday, 19 January)
- Mark Baker (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Kendall Clark (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Mark Baker (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Kendall Clark (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Mark Baker (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Mark Baker (Tuesday, 17 January)
Use Case for DESCRIBE
Use Case for DESCRIBE [CLOSED?]
Use Case for DESCRIBE [OK?]
WSDL comments on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft [OK?]
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:55:53 UTC