- From: Axel Rauschmayer <Axel.Rauschmayer@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:34:44 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: >> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my >> vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard: >> > [...] > > DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding > dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support > of DESCRIBE along with those against... > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE > > Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response. > > Absolutely! You've put my comment at the right place. Still: I've included a caveat, namely that I am not sure if it is a use case for DESCRIBE. If it's not, then my comment should be removed, I guess. Greetings, Axel -- Axel Rauschmayer axel@rauschma.de http://rauschma.de
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 08:58:53 UTC