Re: Use Case for DESCRIBE [OK?]

Dan Connolly wrote:
>> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my  
>> vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard:
>>     
> [...]
>
> DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding
> dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support
> of DESCRIBE along with those against...
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE
>
> Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response.
>
>   
Absolutely! You've put my comment at the right place. Still: I've 
included a caveat, namely that I am not sure if it is a use case for 
DESCRIBE. If it's not, then my comment should be removed, I guess.

Greetings,

Axel

-- 
Axel Rauschmayer
axel@rauschma.de
http://rauschma.de