W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: Use Case for DESCRIBE [OK?]

From: Axel Rauschmayer <Axel.Rauschmayer@ifi.lmu.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:34:44 +0100
Message-ID: <43D8DE04.6050905@ifi.lmu.de>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:
>> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my  
>> vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard:
> [...]
> DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding
> dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support
> of DESCRIBE along with those against...
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE
> Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response.
Absolutely! You've put my comment at the right place. Still: I've 
included a caveat, namely that I am not sure if it is a use case for 
DESCRIBE. If it's not, then my comment should be removed, I guess.



Axel Rauschmayer
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 08:58:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC