- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:35:41 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
* Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >Relative IRIs are combined with base IRIs as per Uniform Resource >Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax [RFC3986] using only the basic >algorithm in Section 5.2 . Neither Syntax-Based Normalization nor >Scheme-Based Normalization (described in sections 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 of >RFC3986) is performed. Characters additionally allowed in IRI >references are treated in the same way that unreserved characters are >treated in URI references, per section 6.5 of Internationalized >Resource Identifiers (IRIs) [RFC3987]. s/combined with/resolved using/ or something like that. This is not really a "combination" process. But basically this is fine with me, thanks. There do not seem to be >On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:24:57AM +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> >> * Dan Connolly wrote: >> >In what way is the same document reference not allowed? Is that >> >something special to SVG? I don't see how it's relevant to SPARQL. >> >> For a query at http://example.org/foo.rq my understanding is that >> there is no difference between >> >> BASE <http://example.org/bar.rdf> >> SELECT ... >> FROM <http://example.org/bar.rdf> >> >> and >> >> BASE <http://example.org/bar.rdf> >> SELECT ... >> FROM <bar.rdf> >> >> and >> >> BASE <http://example.org/bar.rdf> >> SELECT ... >> FROM <> >> >> and >> >> SELECT ... >> FROM <http://example.org/foo.rq> >> >> and >> >> BASE <http://example.org/foo.rq> >> SELECT ... >> FROM <http://example.org/foo.rq> >> >> All refer to the same RDF dataset in the FROM clause, since in each >> case the resolved reference in the FROM clause is equivalent to the >> base resource identifier, which means all of them are same document >> references, so these are queries against the SPARQL document rather >> than some external document. Such a query cannot yield in results. tests for this in the test suite. I'd be good to add these, with the http://example.org/foo.rq and http://example.org/bar.rdf beeing real RDF documents and the query something that could return results. If an implementation returns any results, it's buggy. As I understand it. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:34:59 UTC