- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:15:29 +0100
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 07:15:33 UTC
* Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com> [2005-12-29 14:06-0500] > > This is an editorial comment on: > > > > SPARQL Protocol for RDF > > W3C Working Draft 14 September 2005 > > > > This version: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ > > > > Section 2.3 defines a SOAP 1.2 binding[1]. However, the example in > > section 2.3.1 uses the namespace of SOAP 1.1. > > In the latest editor's draft, 1.81, (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ > DataAccess/proto-wd/), that namespace has been changed to the > namespace for SOAP 1.2. > > Does that address yr comment? Thanks for yr help with this spec. Actually, the SOAP request at [2] still uses the http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ namespace. The SOAP reply looks fine. Regards, Hugo 2. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/#query-bindings-soap -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 07:15:33 UTC