[OK?] Re: [comments] typo and general

On Oct 11, 2005, at 10:14 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:

Karl,

Many of yr comments below are addressed by the latest editor's draft  
of the SPARQL Protocol document:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/

> * Abstract:
> Could you make it clearer?

I believe that it's now clearer.

> * Examples/Graphics/Links
>     Example in the section 2.1 or more context might be helpful to  
> understand what you are talking about. The document is often very  
> hard to understand. For example, you start the section two with:

This section has been reworked.

> Is it normal the double period in the documentation section of WSDL  
> 2.0 profile.

Corrected.

> I'm not sure I would have called figure the "Figure 1.0", maybe  
> excerpt.

Changed to Excerpt.

> * Normative references to XML Schema?
>
>     [[[
>     Abstractly, the contents of the In Message of
>     SparqlQuery's query operation is an instance of an
>     XML Schema complex type, called st:query-result in
>     Figure 1.0, composed of two further parts: one SPARQL
>     query string; and zero or one RDF dataset descriptions.
>     ]]]
>
> Is it a normative reference to XML Schema?

No. It's a reference to a normative XML Schema.

> There are references to this document at least four times and  
> without context.
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/

I believe these are all either removed or will be changed when the QL  
spec is in LC.

> * HTTP Example.
>    Very good part of the specification. But I guess it's not  
> normative so you should say so.

Done.

Please let us know if the latest draft satisfies yr comments (some of  
which are strictly editorial and have not been addressed per se).

Cheers,
Kendall Clark

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 21:45:02 UTC