- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 03:17:48 +0100
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
* Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ does not seem
>> to define what it means if a string literal includes a backslash though
>> that is allowed by the EBNF. Please add normative prose and an example
>> defining and demonstrating proper use of backslashes in string literals.
>> See also <http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#sec-Escaping>.
>The working group has agreed the text in sections A.5 and A.6 of the SPARQL
>grammar section A in the editors' working draft [1] in response to your
>comment. The grammar also includes productions to put such escape sequences
>in strings.
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#grammar
I raised the remaining issues wrt to this in the Unicode issue. I would
have preferred to use the \xXX / \x{....} style escapes like they are
available in RELAX NG Compact Syntax, Perl and others, but well... I
think this issue can be considered closed, thanks.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:16:59 UTC