- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:31:39 -0500 (EST)
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
I trust that the right thing has been done here. peter From: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com> Subject: Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?] Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:39:28 -0000 > > From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT) > > Message-Id: <20050923.103450.72232373.pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > > To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > > > > The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document. > > One should be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable, > > only one should be used. > > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > > Peter, > > The document now only uses the term "blank node" - all mentions of > "bnode" have been replaced or removed. > > Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment. > > If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the > subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping. > > Thanks, > Andy >
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 13:31:54 UTC