Re: URI serialization issues

On Jan 18, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Mark Baker wrote:

> FWIW, I just offered that text as a starting point, and it probably
> goes further than it needs to from my POV.  I think I'd be happy if
> you simply "linked" the choice of GET and POST to the security section
> in *some* manner.

Well, yeah, that's a lot weaker than SHOULD'ing the link. But the WG  
folks who've responded (except for Pat) don't seem to see a  
connection here. I confess that I don't see it.

> I'm also thinking that this might be worth taking to the TAG, just
> from the POV of motivating beefing up the "whenToUseGet" finding which
> doesn't cover this aspect of the issue.  I wouldn't want it to hold up
> your work though.

There's an idea, which I'll let you run with to yr heart's content. :>

Cheers,
Kendall

Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:19:13 UTC