W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:39:28 -0000
Message-ID: <DF5E364A470421429AE6DC96979A4F6F63C36D@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>

> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT)
> Message-Id: <20050923.103450.72232373.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document.
> One should be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable,
> only one should be used.
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider


The document now only uses the term "blank node" - all mentions of
"bnode" have been replaced or removed.

Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.

If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.

Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 10:39:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC