Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?]

> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT)
> Message-Id: <20050923.103450.72232373.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> 
> The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document.
> One should be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable,
> only one should be used.
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Peter,

The document now only uses the term "blank node" - all mentions of
"bnode" have been replaced or removed.

Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.

If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.

	Thanks,
	Andy

Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 10:39:42 UTC