- From: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:20:14 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hi! The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard: - In an RDF editor I'm currently implementing, there is a view that shows all the resources in an RDF graph. - Per resource, it lists the types of the resource, the rdfs:label and the "tags" (which are similar types, but with the tag pointing to the tagged entity and not the other way around). - The problem is that the data returned is NFNF. Accordingly, implementing this using any of the table-based result mechanisms (that I am aware of) is very clumsy. Ordering can help, but needlessly decreases performance and there still has to be some kind of grouping afterwards. Furthermore, users will want to sort the result in the view by rdfs:label. Greetings, Axel -- Axel Rauschmayer http://rauschma.de axel@rauschma.de
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2006 05:07:35 UTC