[CLOSED] Re: [CLOSED] Re: BASE absolute IRIs

yes, that's absolutely fine with me, too.

thanks,
benjamin



On 17.01.2006 00:48:00, Richard Newman wrote:
>Eric,
>
>> The SPARQL language specification does not talk
>> about applications; would this addendum satisfy you:?
>> [[
>> If none of the above specifies the Base URI, the default Base URI
>> (5.1.4, Default Base URI) is used.
>> ]]
>
>That seems satisfying to me.
>
>> Would adding the text
>> [[
>> BASE URIs must be absolute.
>> ]]
>> to section A.1 IRI References address this comment?
>
>As A.1 supplements the grammar, this seems like a perfectly fine  
>solution to me. I've marked this issue as CLOSED, but I would be  
>pleased to receive corroboratory remarks from Benjamin if he agrees.
>
>Many thanks,
>-R
>
>