- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:33:14 -0600
- To: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my > vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard: [...] DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support of DESCRIBE along with those against... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 15:33:20 UTC