- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:34:06 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Thanks; annotating thread state.
Lee
public-rdf-dawg-comments-request@w3.org wrote on 01/28/2006 09:17:48 PM:
>
> * Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ does not
seem
> >> to define what it means if a string literal includes a backslash
though
> >> that is allowed by the EBNF. Please add normative prose and an
example
> >> defining and demonstrating proper use of backslashes in string
literals.
> >> See also <http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#sec-Escaping>.
>
> >The working group has agreed the text in sections A.5 and A.6 of the
SPARQL
> >grammar section A in the editors' working draft [1] in response to your
> >comment. The grammar also includes productions to put such escape
sequences
> >in strings.
>
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#grammar
>
> I raised the remaining issues wrt to this in the Unicode issue. I would
> have preferred to use the \xXX / \x{....} style escapes like they are
> available in RELAX NG Compact Syntax, Perl and others, but well... I
> think this issue can be considered closed, thanks.
> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
>
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:34:11 UTC