- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:04:32 -0500
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Dec 14, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > * Dan Connolly wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ has a >>> number of problems in the various examples that encourage inccorect >>> or suboptimal behavior; the draft should either be changed such that >>> the issues do not occur or such that it is clear why that is not >>> possible; in particular: >>> >>> * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-text-xml >> >> Which ones? How so? What would you suggest instead? > > % GET http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ | > grep -n -P "text/xml" - > 1257:Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 > 1275:Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 > > The correct type might be application/soap+xml. > >>> * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-charset >> >> Which ones? How so? > > % GET http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ | > grep -n -P "xml.*charset" - > 653:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 704:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 805:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 833:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 873:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 960:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 1028:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 1192:Content-Type: application/sparql-results+xml; charset=utf-8 > 1257:Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 > 1275:Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 I believe the latest editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ addresses yr comments sufficiently. Can you let us know whether that's the case? Cheers, Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 22:05:14 UTC