- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:57:43 -0600
- To: axel@rauschma.de
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:34 +0100, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > >> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my > >> vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard: > >> > > [...] > > > > DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding > > dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support > > of DESCRIBE along with those against... > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE > > > > Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response. > > > > > Absolutely! You've put my comment at the right place. Still: I've > included a caveat, namely that I am not sure if it is a use case for > DESCRIBE. Yes, I think it is. Thanks for your careful review and comments. I'm marking this thread closed. > If it's not, then my comment should be removed, I guess. > > Greetings, > > Axel > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2006 17:58:24 UTC