- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:28:55 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Forgot add [OK?] to subject line Andy Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > > Fred Zemke wrote: >> 10.4.3 Description of resources >> Formal definition, you may want to do an explicit DISTINCT reduction >> on "U union project(SM(SQ), VS)" to indicate that the result graph >> does not contain redundant information. > > An RDF graph is a set of statements, any duplication of information > would be > removed at that point. But as blank nodes might be involved, I've > changed it to "distinct(U union project(SM(SQ), VS))" to make it clear. > >> >> Fred Zemke >> >> > > I hope this addresses your comment - please let us know if it does. > > Andy > > >
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 19:29:09 UTC