Sunday, 30 September 2007
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- How to name the XML serialization of HTML5, was: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
Saturday, 29 September 2007
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: Temporary semi-solution to access key debate: support them but disable them by default
- Re: Temporary semi-solution to access key debate: support them but disable them by default
- Re: Temporary semi-solution to access key debate: support them but disable them by default
- Re: Temporary semi-solution to access key debate: support them but disable them by default
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
Friday, 28 September 2007
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: Temporary semi-solution to access key debate: support them but disable them by default
- Temporary semi-solution to access key debate: support them but disable them by default
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- Re: role cardinality [was: Re: ARIA Proposal ]
- Re: ARIA Proposal
- Re: ARIA Proposal
Thursday, 27 September 2007
- Scope of Specification and Principles - Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- [ignore prev. message] [was: Re: role cardinality [was: Re: ARIA Proposal ]]
- Re: role cardinality [was: Re: ARIA Proposal ]
- Re: role cardinality [was: Re: ARIA Proposal ]
- Re: role cardinality [was: Re: ARIA Proposal ]
- role cardinality [was: Re: ARIA Proposal ]
- Re: ARIA Proposal
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: ARIA Proposal
- Re: ARIA Proposal
- Re: ARIA Proposal
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: @role etc Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: <video> accessibility
- Re: ARIA Proposal
- Re: <video> accessibility
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Wednesday, 26 September 2007
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- ARIA Proposal
- Re: common image use example missing from current draft
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: common image use example missing from current draft
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: @role etc Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
Tuesday, 25 September 2007
- Re: HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- HTML 5 and Distributed Extensibility
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: scripting as fallback (was: Re: New elements vs. Trident)
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Monday, 24 September 2007
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- @role etc Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] Latest proposal for offline web app API
- Re: [whatwg] Latest proposal for offline web app API
Sunday, 23 September 2007
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: [whatwg] Latest proposal for offline web app API
Saturday, 22 September 2007
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- RE: [whatwg] Latest proposal for offline web app API
- Re: Fwd: accesskey usage Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Fwd: accesskey usage Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- (Read this one) Mice, Majuscule and Modifiers Re: Keyboard Shortcuts
- Mice, Majuscule and Modifiers Re: Keyboard Shortcuts
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Fwd: accesskey usage Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Degrade Gracefully" Principle
Friday, 21 September 2007
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- accesskey usage Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Latest proposal for offline web app API
- Cancel HTML WG teleconference -- 21 Sep 2007
Thursday, 20 September 2007
Friday, 21 September 2007
Thursday, 20 September 2007
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: What are the odds?
- Comments on drag and drop
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- ARIA in HTML -- a new FAQ, and a proposal
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Proposal for Keyboard Shortcuts for HTML5
- 4 tests of form controls in layout table with author-defined tab navigation order
- Re: is SCOPE sufficient? - a test based on WCAG2 techniques example
- Re: is SCOPE sufficient? - a test based on WCAG2 techniques example
Wednesday, 19 September 2007
- Re: is SCOPE sufficient? - a test based on WCAG2 techniques example
- is SCOPE sufficient? - a test based on WCAG2 techniques example
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
- W3C:Hotel deadline for TPAC2007-- please book your room asap
- Re: Lack of sniffing of text/plain for non-binary content
- Re: [WF2] 6.2. Seeding a form with initial values -- contradiction in algorithm step 5
- scripting as fallback (was: Re: New elements vs. Trident)
- labels and AT (was: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation)
- Fwd: [WF2] 6.2. Seeding a form with initial values -- contradiction in algorithm step 5
- Detailed review of 4.12. Client-side database storage
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
Monday, 17 September 2007
- Re: <video> accessibility
- Re: Responses to assorted ponts (was Re: New elements vs. Trident)
- Responses to assorted ponts (was Re: New elements vs. Trident)
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: <video> accessibility
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage
- Re: <video> accessibility
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: <video> accessibility
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- <video> accessibility
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Unquoted attributes starting with =
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
Sunday, 16 September 2007
- Re: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New elements vs. Trident
- Re: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Re: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Re: Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Proposal for <figure> graceful degradation
- Re: New block-level elements vs. Gecko
- New elements vs. Trident
- Re: New block-level elements vs. Gecko
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- New block-level elements vs. Gecko
- Re: smart verbosity for table headers (was: headers= and rowgroup)
- Re: smart verbosity for table headers (was: headers= and rowgroup)
Saturday, 15 September 2007
- Re: smart verbosity for table headers (was: headers= and rowgroup)
- Unquoted attributes starting with =
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Longdesc usage Re: User Testing ...
- Re: Image controls and form submission
- Re: smart verbosity for table headers (was: headers= and rowgroup)
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
Friday, 14 September 2007
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- RE: screen-reader versus self-voicing app
- Re: VoiceOver [Was Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app]
- VoiceOver [Was Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app]
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: Image controls and form submission
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- HDP: Revised "Degrade Gracefully" Principle
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Image controls and form submission
- Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- RE: screen-reader versus self-voicing app
- Re: HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- draft minutes from 13 September 2007 HTML WG Telecon
Thursday, 13 September 2007
- Agend for HTML WG telcon [was: HTML WG teleconference 2007-09-13]
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- HDP: Revised "Support Existing Content" Principle
- HDP: Revised Introductory Material
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Typo in 4.4.3.1. Link type "alternate"
- Detailed review of 4.1. Browsing contexts and 4.3. Session history and navigation
- Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-09-13
- HTML WG teleconference 2007-09-13
Wednesday, 12 September 2007
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Re: Web Forms 2 input type=email
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Re: Web Forms 2 input type=email (was Re: autosubmit)
- Re: Web Forms 2 input type=email (was Re: autosubmit)
- Re: autosubmit
- Re: Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- Re: autosubmit
- Re: autosubmit
- Re: autosubmit (was: Re: Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements)
- Re: Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- autosubmit (was: Re: Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements)
- Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements
- comment on html 5 spec image example for 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image'
- Re: headers= and rowgroup
- common image use example missing from current draft
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: headers= and rowgroup (was: Re: Data Table Collections (Research))
Tuesday, 11 September 2007
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- RE: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Detailed review of 3.18.2. The datagrid element
- RE: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- One size does not fit all
- RE: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- RE: What are the odds?
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: What are the odds?
- Serializing XML with innerHTML (detailed review of the DOM)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Monday, 10 September 2007
Tuesday, 11 September 2007
- headers= and rowgroup (was: Re: Data Table Collections (Research))
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: testing versus expert opinion
- Re: testing versus expert opinion
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: testing versus expert opinion
- testing versus expert opinion
- Proposal for document conformance criteria on characters —was [Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization]
- RE: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- International vs Multilingual / Device Independence Re: screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: What are the odds?
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
Monday, 10 September 2007
- Re: What are the odds?
- What are the odds?
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- [WF2] 6.2. Seeding a form with initial values -- contradiction in algorithm step 5
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- screen-reader versus self-voicing app (was: Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
- Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: a question about alt
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: q, quote, blockquote
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
Friday, 7 September 2007
Monday, 10 September 2007
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
Sunday, 9 September 2007
- Re: Lack of sniffing of text/plain for non-binary content
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: Lack of sniffing of text/plain for non-binary content
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: The script language attribute
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Saturday, 8 September 2007
- Lack of sniffing of text/plain for non-binary content
- Re: The script language attribute
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Detailed review of 3.18.1 The details element
- Re: The script language attribute
- Re: The script language attribute
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: The script language attribute
- Re: The script language attribute
- The script language attribute
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: the document character set for text/thml serialization
- the document character set for text/thml serialization
Friday, 7 September 2007
- Re: Data Table Collections (Research)
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- Re: XSLT and HTML5 (was: Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML)
- Proposals: Abbreviations (including acronyms and Initialisms)
- Re: XSLT and HTML5 (was: Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML)
- Re: XSLT and HTML5 (was: Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML)
Thursday, 6 September 2007
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: Use cases for a few elements: datalist
- Re: Use cases for a few elements: datalist
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: designMode and event listeners (detailed review of Editing)
- Re: a question about alt
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- XSLT and HTML5 (was: Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML)
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: </html> followed by spaces (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- designMode and event listeners (detailed review of Editing)
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: a question about alt
- Re: More about <alt>
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: a question about alt
- Re: a question about alt
- a question about alt
- Re: Use cases for a few elements: event-source, details, datagrid, datalist, menu, and command
- Re: More about <alt> (was Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5)
- Use case - event-source
- Re[2]: Textarea and rendering of its marked-up value
- Use cases for a few elements: event-source, details, datagrid, datalist, menu, and command
- Re: Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing
Wednesday, 5 September 2007
- Re: 2.3.2. DOMTokenList
- Re: 2.3.2. DOMTokenList
- Re: load event for dynamic iframes - firing when changing the frame's location
- Re: load event for dynamic iframes - firing when changing the frame's location
- 2.3.2. DOMTokenList
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#image-maps
- http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#image-maps
- 3.14.13. The area element
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: More about <alt>
Tuesday, 4 September 2007
Wednesday, 5 September 2007
- Re: More about <alt> (was Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5)
- Re: Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- More about <alt> (was Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5)
- load event for dynamic iframes - firing when changing the frame's location
Tuesday, 4 September 2007
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
- Re: Current status of RDFa in HTML5?
- Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Current status of RDFa in HTML5?
- RE: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: 3.7.4. The link element (Spec Review)
- RE: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
- Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
- Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
- Re: User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- User Testing footage of header/id combinations, @summary and @longdesc for HTML5 WG
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: 3.7.4. The link element (Spec Review)
- Re: 3.7.4. The link element (Spec Review)
- RE: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- RE: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Monday, 3 September 2007
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: Ruby in HTML
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- RE: Ruby in HTML
- Re: Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- RE: Ruby in HTML
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- Re: Content model of <map> (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility
- Getting input from AT developers (was Re: Screen-reader behaviour)
- RE: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: @title's relation to accessibility (was Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5)
- Re: Ruby in HTML
- Minutes for 2007-08-30 HTMLWG phone conference
- Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Joining the WG Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Question about mis-nested form controls and parsing
- Re: Web Forms 2 reviews - which version of WF2?
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: What <object> represents in different views (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Sunday, 2 September 2007
- Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Web Forms 2 reviews - which version of WF2?
- Re: Spec review: "URI (or IRI)"
- 3.7.4. The link element (Spec Review)
- Re: Spec review: "URI (or IRI)"
- Re: Spec review: "URI (or IRI)"
- Re: Spec review: "URI (or IRI)"
- Spec review: "URI (or IRI)"
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
- @title's relation to accessibility (was Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5)
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Re: Screen-reader behaviour
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Re: Content model of <map> (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Textarea and rendering of its marked-up value
- Re: Content model of <map> (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
Saturday, 1 September 2007
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Re: What <object> represents in different views (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- What <object> represents in different views (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: </html> followed by spaces (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Newlines between comments after root (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Re: </html> followed by spaces (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Re: </html> followed by spaces (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- </html> followed by spaces (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
- Comments starting with > or -> (detailed review of Writing HTML documents)
- Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2)
- Re: making better ad hoc use of class attribute values
- Content model of <map> (detailed review of Semantics)
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- [wf2] Where to wrap in textarea (detailed review of Web Forms 2.0)
- Re: Downloading of images by UA
- Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
- Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
- Re: WF2 2.13. Adding type attribute for the output element (Part of detailed review of WF2)
- Re: Downloading of images by UA
- Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5