- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:10:44 +0200
- To: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
(This is part of my detailed review of the Semantics and structure of HTML elements section.) The spec says about <object>: In the absence of other factors (such as style sheets), user agents must show the user what the object element represents. Thus, the contents of object elements act as fallback content, to be used only when referenced resources can't be shown (e.g. because it returned a 404 error). This allows multiple object elements to be nested inside each other, targeting multiple user agents with different capabilities, with the user agent picking the best one it supports. However, what about the case where the UA supports the primary format but it can't be "shown" in a particular view (e.g. an image when reading the document aloud)? Shouldn't the fallback be used in such cases, just like alt="" would be used for <img>? I haven't thought much about this yet or how it's supposed to work, though. See this comment: http://juicystudio.com/article/html5-image-element-no-alt.php#comment19 -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 1 September 2007 19:10:59 UTC