- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:21:11 -0700
- To: Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A059853C-93F5-4C47-AC41-2847F52E8122@apple.com>
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > Hi anne and mjs > > <anne> also funny: http://html4all.org/pipermail/list_html4all.org/2007-September/000267.html > <mjs_> yes, actual testing counts for more than the opinion of an > official expert > <mjs> the shocking secret is out > > cite:http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20070911 > Just wondered what testing was done before deciding to make the alt > attribute optional? Or was the decision based solely on expert > opinion? > Can we please not post out-of-context comments from IRC on the working group list, with the apparent intent of instigating a flamewar? If you follow the IRC link in the email link in the IRC link from which you quoted, you'll see that I said that making alt optional (even in the very rare cases where it was made optional) should be reconsidered in light of the testing done. On the other hand, others have argued that designing accessibility features solely based on the state of current assistive technology is unwise and will slow improvements in the state of accessibility. My follow-up comment was that I find the testing more persuasive than the opinions of experts. This applies to my own expert opinion as well. I would hope that any intellectually honest expert would concede this point. In other recent IRC discussions, I argued that noalt might be valuable as a flag for deliberately omitted alt, to regain some of the conformance checking benefits of alt being mandatory. In my strongly held opinion, being willing to reconsider one's position in light of material evidence is a virtue, and one we will all need to learn to make progress in this working group. Being unwilling to ever change your own mind, and picking a fight with people who change their position to be closer to yours, are both unproductive. More significantly, trying to create a dispute where there is none is trolling. I will do my best to look past it in this case but please try to keep this kind of abusive behavior off the mailing list in the future. Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 09:21:31 UTC