- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:53:27 +0200
- To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <lhs@malform.no>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:39:50 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> wrote: > Please quote. I don't see anything that can be interpreted like that. I quoted the definition of rowgroup before. >> I'm not sure what the meaning of many features in HTML4 is when used in >> non-typical ways. The specification is not really useful. > > It is not really useful to not want to make sense of it. And also, the > HTML5 draft does not say that rowgroup cannot be applied to THEAD/TFOOT. > So what would the improvement be? The HTML5 algorithm is not yet good enough, but at least it's clear what it implies. > The HTML5 draft isn't anymore spesific than HTML4 about which direction > scope="rowgroup" and scope="colgroup" goes. [...] >> If [TH] is in the row group state [...] let (1, groupy) be the >> slot at which the row group is anchored, let height be the >> number of rows in the row group, and assign the header cell >> to any data cells anchored at slots with coordinates (datax, >> datay) where headerx ≤ datax ≤ xmax and headery ≤ datay < >> groupy+height > > I am not sure if have got this part of the algorithm 100% correcty, but > my understanding is that the phrase «headerx ≤ datax ≤ xmax» tells which > _direction_ a header in «the row group state» has - namely horisontal > direction. You completely read over the bit where it talks about "height" and "headery" for some reason. > Why has that change been drafted? HTML5 is written from scratch. (As in, it's not HTML4 + changes. And as such it may contain inconsistencies with HTML4 that are either desirable or not.) > «rowgroup simply works»? Well, it «it simply works» in the Table > Inspector. I hope we can make into a tool we can trust. I'm not sure that's possible for HTML4 given the lack of a proper specification. It's not entirely clear to me what you mean with "trust" either. The tool is open source and everyone can simply fork their own version. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 14:53:53 UTC