- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:20:14 +0100
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > This makes it impossible to require semantic elements to be used for > their semantics. This would allow me to do something like <h1>This is > nice large text, which isn't a header</h1> in a conformant HTML 5 > document. We need to require things like this, even if it is impossible > to check these electronically. This can qualify only as a "should". If it can't be checked programatically, it can't be a "must". Philip TAYLOR
Received on Saturday, 1 September 2007 08:20:32 UTC