- From: Marek Paw這wski <marekp.w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:32:55 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
(This is part of my detailed review of the Document Object Model section.) 1. I suggest DOMTokenList methods add() and remove() return DOMTokenList itself. This would allow for useful function chaining, f.e.: myDiv.classList.add('toFront').toggle('maximized'); Consider that jQuery already uses similiar approach. I'm not sure if this would be useful on other objects which use DOMTokenList interface but certainly it is for classList. I'd even consider such behavior for toggle() but I don't have strong opinion about that. 2. Anyway, I know that this was discussed on WHATWG list but why not extend className instead of adding classList? Is this producing some serious compatibility problems? As I understand current spec classList stringify to the same value as className. 3. I'm not sure if it is intended but with current algorithms for adding token in add() and toggle() methods when DOMTokenList object's underlying string is empty it ends up with value of U+0020 SPACE + token. Shouldn't there be condition that if underlying string is empty then append only token? I believe that today's common way of obtaining classList is via: classArray = myDiv.classList.split(' '); With current algorithm it will lead to array with additional empty elemets and could cause some compatibility problems with existing pages. -- Best regards, Marek Paw這wski
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:01:46 UTC