- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 07:56:56 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 04/09/07, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote: > > Remember that "accessibility" doesn't just mean "readable to blind people". > > Within the W3C space, it does. I dislike it, but I think we need to be > realistic about it. Untrue. 9 years ago I was corrected, by a W3C employee, when I made that assumption. Quite strongly IIRC. [... ]<del>accessibility</del><ins>universality</ins>. > > To be honest, I don't even see the universality aspect of @title. Making use > of an element or attribute to specify its meaning is 'just' about semantics > isn't it? How about semantics that are helpfully leveraged for many users? My liking is that I can tell if it's a PDF at the end of the link, or a site that needs log-in. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 06:57:03 UTC