www-tag@w3.org from July 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Sunday, 21 July)
• Re: using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] (Friday, 12 July)

Al Gilman

• Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 23 July)

Anthony B. Coates

• Re: Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)

Bill de hÓra

• RE: httpRange proposed text (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: xlink:href (Wednesday, 17 July)
• RE: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Two requests regarding TB16- was: naming and neccessity (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs (Sunday, 21 July)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

• RE: httpRange proposed text (Tuesday, 30 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Monday, 29 July)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• RE: resource and representation (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: resource and representation (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

Chris Croome

• Taxis via HTTP? [Was: Re: [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15)] (Tuesday, 30 July)

Chris Lilley

• customMediaType-2 : charset in RFC 3023 (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: xlink:href (Thursday, 4 July)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: xlink:href (Friday, 12 July)
• RE: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) (Friday, 5 July)

Dan Connolly

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? (Wednesday, 31 July)
• [httpRange-14] range of mid:, tel:, uuid: etc. (Tuesday, 30 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs (Thursday, 18 July)
• using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] (Friday, 12 July)

Dare Obasanjo

• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

David Orchard

• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Wednesday, 3 July)

Graham Klyne

• Thoughts on "what does an HTTP URI identify?" (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Internet Media Type registration Re: [Minutes] 8 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, media types, formatting props, whenToUseGet-7, augmentedInfoset-22) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) (Tuesday, 2 July)

Hallam-Baker, Phillip

• RE: [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Co ntent (Friday, 26 July)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties (Sunday, 7 July)

Ian B. Jacobs

• [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• [Finding] Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics (Thursday, 25 July)
• [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Thursday, 25 July)
• [Agenda] 29 July 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15) (Thursday, 25 July)
• [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [contentTypeOverride-24] Can a specification include rules for overriding HTTP content type parameters? (Wednesday, 24 July)
• [Minutes] 22 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• [Agenda] 22 July TAG teleconference (arch doc, httpRange-14,...) (Thursday, 18 July)
• [Minutes] 15 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, qnames as ids, formatting props, httpRange-14) (Tuesday, 16 July)
• [Agenda] 15 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, qnames, formatting props, httpRange-14) (Thursday, 11 July)
• [Minutes] 8 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, media types, formatting props, whenToUseGet-7, augmentedInfoset-22) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Summary of TAG activity from 9 June to 2 July 2002 (Monday, 8 July)
• [Agenda] 8 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) (Thursday, 4 July)
• [w3cMediaType-1] How to Register an Media Type with IANA (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Early draft of Architecture Document for your review (Monday, 1 July)
• [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

james anderson

• Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Friday, 26 July)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) (Tuesday, 2 July)

Jonathan Borden

• URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• range of http: modeling HTTP in RDF (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Representations of Resources and Precision of Denotation (was Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'? (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re:Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Co ntent (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: [Finding] Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Thursday, 25 July)

Joshua Allen

• RE: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 30 July)
• RE: httpRange proposed text (Tuesday, 30 July)
• RE: httpRange proposed text (Tuesday, 30 July)
• RE: httpRange proposed text (Monday, 29 July)
• httpRange proposed text (Monday, 29 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)
• RE: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries (Friday, 26 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• RE: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking (Tuesday, 9 July)
• "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" (Tuesday, 9 July)
• "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• RE: Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'? (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

Julian Reschke

• RE: Fixed Section 1.1 language (Tuesday, 30 July)

Keith Moore

• Re: using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] (Saturday, 13 July)

Kenneth J. Hughes

• Re: resource and representation (and fragment identifiers) (Friday, 12 July)

Lucas Gonze

• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Wednesday, 24 July)

Mark Baker

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? (Thursday, 1 August)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Maintaining uniformity with HTTP URIs (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries (Friday, 26 July)
• Fragment identifiers and intermediaries (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: using http URIs to name IETF protocol elements [was: TB16] (Friday, 12 July)
• Range of Web architecture? (was Re: Early draft of Architecture Document for your review (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" (Tuesday, 9 July)
• ConegFragment (was Re: Early draft of Architecture Document for your review (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• httpRange-14; closer than we think to closing it? (Tuesday, 2 July)

Martin Duerst

• URIEquivalence-15 (was: Re: [Minutes] 22 July TAG teleconf) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• Re: Updated finding: Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics (Wednesday, 17 July)

Matthew Wilson

• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)

Michael Kay

• RE: TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Tuesday, 9 July)
• TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Tuesday, 9 July)

Michael Mealling

• Re: Taxis via HTTP? [Was: Re: [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15)] (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [Minutes] 29 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, URIEquivalence-15) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

Mike Dierken

• RE: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Friday, 19 July)
• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)

Miles Sabin

• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Sunday, 21 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)

Misha.Wolf@reuters.com

• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [Agenda] 8 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [Agenda] 8 July TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) (Thursday, 4 July)

Nick Kew

• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Saturday, 20 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 19 July)

nick@webthing.com

• RE: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)
• RE: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

Norman Walsh

• RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs (Thursday, 18 July)
• On XPointer and the context-independence of URIs (Thursday, 18 July)
• Republished finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: Proposed TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Ident ifiers in Content (Monday, 15 July)
• Updated finding: Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and Semantics (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Monday, 8 July)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'? (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re:Comments on arch doc draft (Thursday, 4 July)
• Representations of Resources and Precision of Denotation (was Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?: Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)

Paul Cotton

• RE: I'd like to un-raise augmentedInfoset-22 (Wednesday, 10 July)
• RE: Infoset consistency between versions (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: Infoset consistency between versions (Tuesday, 9 July)

Paul Grosso

• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: Resource references/httpRange-14 (was: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf) (Tuesday, 2 July)

Paul Prescod

• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivable, R esolvable. (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: xlink:href (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• xlink:href (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

Rick Jelliffe

• Infoset consistency between versions (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Wednesday, 3 July)
• QNames and the XPointer namespace scheme (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: A radical finding on Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content (Tuesday, 2 July)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: fragment identifiers (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: resource equivalence was: Re: fragment identifiers (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 23 July)
• fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: resource and representation (Monday, 8 July)
• resource and representation (Thursday, 4 July)

Sean B. Palmer

• [httpRange-14] Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Friday, 19 July)

Simon St.Laurent

• Re: I'd like to un-raise augmentedInfoset-22 (Thursday, 11 July)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: xlink:href (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: xlink:href (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: XLINK, HLINK or neither? Possible new TAG issue (Wednesday, 10 July)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: httpRange proposed text (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Monday, 29 July)
• Internet Media Type registration Re: [Minutes] 8 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, media types, formatting props, whenToUseGet-7, augmentedInfoset-22) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivable, R esolvable. (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)
• TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Monday, 1 July)

Tim Bray

• Re: httpRange proposed text (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: httpRange proposed text (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: httpRange proposed text (Monday, 29 July)
• Just updated s1.1 arch doc draft again (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that dee p linking is not an illegal act? (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [deepLinking-25] What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act? (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: fragment identifiers (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: xlink:href (Wednesday, 17 July)
• httpRange-14 , what's the problem (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Fixed Section 1.1 language (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Re: xlink:href (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Friday, 12 July)
• I'd like to un-raise augmentedInfoset-22 (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Infoset consistency between versions (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET" (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Some comments on latest draft (Monday, 8 July)
• Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Section 1.1 Characteristics of URIs: Minor editorial (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Context Independent URI (Monday, 22 July)
• Context Independent URI (Sunday, 21 July)
• RE: Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivabl e, R esolvable. (Monday, 15 July)
• Architecture Document: Terminology: Dereferencable, Retrivable, R esolvable. (Friday, 12 July)
• RE: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14) (Friday, 5 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft (Tuesday, 2 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 21:04:17 UTC