- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 02:04:47 +0100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- Cc: "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>
At 04:21 PM 7/17/02 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >Then the argument is a waste of time anyway, since it doesn't prevent >RDF from having to deal with those resources that are not documents. I think I'm missing something here: RDF treats all URIs (and URI references) without regard for the URI scheme, so if there's a problem here I don't think it's with RDF. The only issue for RDF that I'm aware of is how to deal with URI references containing fragment identifiers. (See my earlier proposal/note to this list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0020.html) I'm posting this note because I suspect the debate may be confusing a couple of (mostly) distinct issues (and I suspect I'm as guilty as anyone of propagating the confusion in the above-cited message in the final paragraph). #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 22:29:17 UTC