RE: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14)

Hi Jean-Jacques,

I've taken a look at the messages you reference from Hugo. Has he submitted
them to xmlp-comments yet or is this part of the process of ws-arch
formulating it's response to the last call on SOAP 1.2? 

I think the proper place for discussion of these comments in the first
instance is the XMLP-WG as part of the process of addressing Last Call
comments.

The TAG has invited the XMLP WG to draw the TAG's attention to matters of
Web Architecture [1].

Of the comments that Hugo makes the following, from [2], may be of interest
to the TAG.

<quote>
	5) Comment: QName vs URI

	Sections 5.4.1.3[4] and 5.4.6[5] use and define QNames to identify
	fault types, whereas AR009.3 calls for URIs.

	This is related to two open TAG issues:
	- Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content[6].
	- Algorithm for creating a URI from a QName[7].

	We should probably point this out.
	...

	4.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/#faultsubvalueelem
	5. http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/#faultcodes
</quote>

However, I assume AR009.3 is a requirement from ws-arch and might also
properly be the subject of discussion within the Web Services activity.

Best regards

Stuart Williams
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jul/0011.html (member only).
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0019.html
--

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: 04 July 2002 15:45
> To: Williams Stuart; Ian B. Jacobs; www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call,
> xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14)
> 
> 
> Just in case, here is a further message[1] from Hugo.
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0057.html
> 
> Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
> 
> > Stuart, you may be interested in Hugo's review[1,2] of SOAP 1.2.
> >
> > Jean-Jacques.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0019.html
> >
> > [2]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0020.html
> >
> > "Ian B. Jacobs" wrote:
> >
> > > ------------------------------------------
> > > 2.1 Review SOAP in last call?
> > > ------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > SW: The XMLP WG has asked the TAG whether they will
> > > review the SOAP 1.0 specification in last call.
> > >
> > > RF, SW: SOAP 1.2 is not sufficiently architectural in
> > > scope (in the way the CharMod spec was).
> > >
> > > Resolved: The TAG does not intend to commit to a
> > > complete review of the last call document. The XMLP WG
> > > should indicate whether there is a particular issue
> > > having architectural scope they want us to look at.
> > >
> > > Action SW: Respond to XMLP WG on behalf of TAG.
>

Received on Friday, 5 July 2002 12:39:28 UTC