W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Namespace document and representations was Re: Arch doc: meaning of term 'representation'?

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 10:49:51 +0300
To: ext Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>, WWW TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B949D8CF.17DA8%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

On 2002-07-04 1:26, "ext Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com> wrote:

> 
>> One could then safely say that a namespace document is a
> _representation_
>> of a namespace, and avoid confusion.
> 
> Exactly.  And when you do a GET on the URL of the namespace document,
> you get a representation of the namespace _document_.  I'm fine with
> that wording.

Sorry, but I consider a namespace and a namespace document two
different things.

Such ambiguity may work fine for the Web, but if the Web
trully is to serve as the foundation for the Semantic Web,
then it should start taking the higher precision needs of
the Semantic Web to heart.

Patrick 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2002 03:49:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:09 GMT