Just in case, here is a further message[1] from Hugo. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0057.html Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > Stuart, you may be interested in Hugo's review[1,2] of SOAP 1.2. > > Jean-Jacques. > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0019.html > > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0020.html > > "Ian B. Jacobs" wrote: > > > ------------------------------------------ > > 2.1 Review SOAP in last call? > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > SW: The XMLP WG has asked the TAG whether they will > > review the SOAP 1.0 specification in last call. > > > > RF, SW: SOAP 1.2 is not sufficiently architectural in > > scope (in the way the CharMod spec was). > > > > Resolved: The TAG does not intend to commit to a > > complete review of the last call document. The XMLP WG > > should indicate whether there is a particular issue > > having architectural scope they want us to look at. > > > > Action SW: Respond to XMLP WG on behalf of TAG.Received on Thursday, 4 July 2002 10:45:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:52 GMT