W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: httpRange proposed text

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:17:14 -0700
Message-ID: <3D45BEEA.6030501@textuality.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org

Joshua Allen wrote:

> "If two people independently use the same URI as an identifier, they
> should be able to have a reasonable degree of confidence that they are
> identifying the same resource.  
> People should not be required to parse, dereference, or otherwise
> acquire any *additional* disambiguating information to provide this
> basic guarantee.  
> Resource naming practices should be considered carefully, and people are
> strongly discouraged from naming resources in a manner that
> unnecessarily weakens this guarantee."

The intent seems good, but how on earth do you build this confidence? 
By relying on the human-language semantics of the opaque part of the 
URI?  Does this scale to very large datasets?  Are you asking people to 
believe that a URI represents what a reasonable person would parse out 
by reading it?

Hmm... I'd be way more comfortable with a trusted provider of RDF 
assertions giving me lengthy-as-necessary descriptions of what any URI 
points to, even if it is 
or the like.  -Tim
Received on Monday, 29 July 2002 18:17:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:33 UTC