Re: fragment identifiers

Joshua Allen wrote:

[[

> why this must be the case -- e.g. what breaks if we allow something
like
> http://example.org/term/Car to refer to the concept "Car"? RDF would
be
> happy as a clam with this.

There are systems built on RDF which are NOT "happy as a clam" with
this.  EARL is one example.

RDF itself is neutral; at best you could say that RDF is ambivalent.
The systems which use RDF will NOT be ambivalent about identity, though.

]]

How does EARL break? If EARL is broken, I suspect _something else_ broke it.
Educate us.

Jonathan