- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:08:09 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>, "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
whoops... > > 1) If HTTP URIs necessarily identify documents, what does > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema > > identify? > > a) The XML Schema Definition _Language_ > b) The specification that describes the XML Schema Definition Language > > It seems to me that an XML Namespace is not a document, and so by your > reasoning we should REQUIRE that XML Namespaces MUST have a '#' which leads > me to the second question: > I meant to say: 1) If HTTP URIs necessarily identify documents, what does http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema identify? a) The XML Schema Definition _Language_ b) The namespace of the XSDL c) The specification that describes the XSDL You see if the range of "http" is restricted to documents (i.e. "c") then it really is confusing to use http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema to identify the namespace of XSDL. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 29 July 2002 14:14:35 UTC