W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:08:09 -0400
Message-ID: <076701c2372a$e693df80$0a2e249b@nemc.org>
To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>, "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>
Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>

whoops...
>
> 1) If HTTP URIs necessarily identify documents, what does
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
>
> identify?
>
> a) The XML Schema Definition _Language_
> b) The specification that describes the XML Schema Definition Language
>
> It seems to me that an XML Namespace is not a document, and so by your
> reasoning we should REQUIRE that XML Namespaces MUST have a '#' which
leads
> me to the second question:
>

I meant to say:

1) If HTTP URIs necessarily identify documents, what does

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema

identify?

a) The XML Schema Definition _Language_
b) The namespace of the XSDL
c) The specification that describes the XSDL

You see if the range of "http" is restricted to documents (i.e. "c") then it
really is confusing to use http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema to identify the
namespace of XSDL.

Jonathan
Received on Monday, 29 July 2002 14:14:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:10 GMT