W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: [Minutes] 1 July TAG teleconf (SOAP last call, xlinkScope-23, Arch Doc and httpRange-14)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <3D2D8275.89B0F741@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org, "'hugo@w3.org'" <hugo@w3.org>

Hi Stuart,

Sorry for the late response. Comments interspersed below.


"Williams, Stuart" wrote:

> I've taken a look at the messages you reference from Hugo. Has he submitted
> them to xmlp-comments yet or is this part of the process of ws-arch
> formulating it's response to the last call on SOAP 1.2?

The latter, I think; but I don't want to put words in Hugo's -or WS-Arch's-

> I think the proper place for discussion of these comments in the first
> instance is the XMLP-WG as part of the process of addressing Last Call
> comments.

I agree.

> The TAG has invited the XMLP WG to draw the TAG's attention to matters of
> Web Architecture [1].
> Of the comments that Hugo makes the following, from [2], may be of interest
> to the TAG.

I am please you did find some interesting material.

> <quote>
>         5) Comment: QName vs URI
>         Sections[4] and 5.4.6[5] use and define QNames to identify
>         fault types, whereas AR009.3 calls for URIs.
>         This is related to two open TAG issues:
>         - Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content[6].
>         - Algorithm for creating a URI from a QName[7].
>         We should probably point this out.
>         ...
>         4.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/#faultsubvalueelem
>         5. http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/#faultcodes
> </quote>
> However, I assume AR009.3 is a requirement from ws-arch and might also
> properly be the subject of discussion within the Web Services activity.
> Best regards
> Stuart Williams
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 09:05:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:32 UTC