W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Re: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET"

From: Anthony B. Coates <abcwww@xmljava.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 8:16:21 +0000
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020710081621.PMWN15606.fep08-svc.ttyl.com@localhost>

> From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

> I'm surprised - I've been doing web stuff since '93, in many different 
> kinds of scenarios, and have never seen any system failure traceable to 
> the URI being too long.

Between '96 and '98, when I was doing Web development, we had problems because IE only allowed <2K for a URL (we gave up testing Netscape at 16M - it was enough).  You might argue that with something of this size, we should have been using a POST, but the truth is that many applications then (and I guess now too) only provided support for GET, not POST, so the only recourse was long URLs.


Anthony B. Coates
Financial XML Specialist

Freeserve AnyTime, only 13.99 per month with one month's FREE trial!
For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on 0800 970 8890
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 04:16:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:32 UTC