Re: Fragment identifiers and intermediaries

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>...These seem only to have conventional
> interpretation as meaning, "some element that has an attribute that is
> of type ID that has the same value as the fragment identifier". Of course,
> RDF doesn't have a DTD, ...

Well actually, if RDF did have an XML Schema then type

attribute rdf:ID{xsd:ID}

 would do fine for naked fragids, according to XPointer. Now RDF does have a
RELAXNG, which _would work_ if XPointer referenced that as well, but it
doesn't so your point stands.

This all sort of almost works, but not quite ...

Jonathan