- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:41:37 +0100
- To: "'www-tag'" <www-tag@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Paul Prescod > > Sometimes you really do want to make an assertion about a > representation of a resource. Mark Baker says to use > Content-Location but I think there needs to be a totally > declarative way for RDF to say: "this is a statement about > the resource" and "this is a statement about the HTML > representation" and even "this is a statement about the > thirteen character in the HTML representation." If we > standardized that then I think that much of this debate would go away. Paul, To do that you require a URI to name that representation. That will be a distinct URI from the resource in question. How we decide to name representations is a policy matter, and has nothing to do with RDF. RDF will work fine with representations that are 'lifted' into resources. That you have a naming explosion, or that thinking about a Web where representations are resources might seem odd, is incidental to RDF. Bill de hÓra
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 04:42:35 UTC