W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2002

Re: TB16 Re: Comments on arch doc draft

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:45:39 -0700
Message-ID: <3D223B23.64706340@prescod.net>
To: Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>, www-tag@w3.org
CC: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Michael Mealling wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> If there were some language in there explaining why it was SHOULD and
> what valid reasons for not following the recommendation I would be
> much happier...

That would constrain users from using their common sense. Are you sure
you want to do that? If you push the issue you might not like what comes
out.

> But still, I think the language should not mention any particular URI scheme.
> Only particular semantics that schemes would need for a given application.

Fine with me. "Easily accessible" strongly implies HTTP anyhow, and for
the purposes of discussion FTP is probably just as good. URN: is not,
I'm afraid, unless your target audience has a URN resolution system
deployed.
---
Come discuss XML and REST web services at:
  Open Source Conference: July 22-26, 2002,
conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
  Extreme Markup: Aug 4-9, 2002,  www.extrememarkup.com/extreme/
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 19:46:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:09 GMT