>I have found another case of namespaces being declared outside the xmlns >framework, which would go against the Qnames policy currently being flagpoled. > >It is in a draft WD that has not been released yet, so I won't >discuss details, >but see > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-linking-wg/2002May/att-0150/03-WD-xptr-xmlns.htm > Not being privy to the inner workings of the W3C Illuminati, I don't know what's in that message, but the current public draft of XPointer violates the principal as well, for the reason that XPointers are not exclusively used in XML documents. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 09:53:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:41 GMT