www-style@w3.org from October 2001 by date

Wednesday, 31 October 2001

• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni
• mozilla, css2, and system widgets Tim Maroney

Monday, 29 October 2001

• Re: Select box drop down width Tantek Celik
• Select box drop down width Zongker, Jeremy
• RE: Standards Compliance and msn (off topic) Chris Wilson
• RE: Standards Compliance and msn (off topic) Peter Foti (PeterF)
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: :target pseudo-class vs. XPointer Bjoern Hoehrmann

Sunday, 28 October 2001

• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Darren Ferguson
• Re: :target pseudo-class vs. XPointer Chris Lilley
• Appologies Frank Boumphrey
• Re: Deplorable Taste Was (Re: Standards Compliance and msn ) Frank Boumphrey
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: :contains perfomance Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Errata in CSS3 selectors Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 27 October 2001

• Re: CSS3: margins fantasai
• Re: Deplorable Taste Was (Re: Standards Compliance and msn ) Matthew D. Fuller
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Darren Ferguson
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: Deplorable Taste Was (Re: Standards Compliance and msn ) Jan Roland Eriksson
• The topic is "style" - (Was - Deplorable Taste) Svgdeveloper@aol.com

Friday, 26 October 2001

• Deplorable Taste Was (Re: Standards Compliance and msn ) Frank Boumphrey
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Darren Ferguson
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn [off-topic] Dylan Schiemann
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Alison Furlong
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Vadim Plessky
• RE: To fix box-model positioning Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jeffrey Yasskin
• RE: Standards Compliance and msn Zoltan Hawryluk
• background-clip [WD-css3-background-20010924] Dylan Schiemann
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet MURATA Makoto
• RE: Standards Compliance and msn Chris Wilson
• RE: Standards Compliance and msn Chris Wilson
• RE: Standards Compliance and msn Chris Wilson
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Eric A. Meyer
• Re: AAARGHHH! That really makes me upset!!!! RE: Standards Compli ance and msn Vadim Plessky
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Vadim Plessky
• RE: AAARGHHH! That really makes me upset!!!! RE: Standards Compli ance and msn Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Bjoern Hoehrmann
• AAARGHHH! That really makes me upset!!!! RE: Standards Compliance and msn Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• RE: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet MURATA Makoto
• Re: Comments on WD-css3-background-20010924 Bert Bos
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni
• To fix box-model positioning Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: Standards Compliance and msn Jan Roland Eriksson
• Standards Compliance and msn Dylan Schiemann

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• RE: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• RE: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky
• Re: Comments on WD-css3-background-20010924 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Tantek Celik
• RE: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Aaron L. Patterson
• Behavioral CSS extensions: Method parameters... Jon Rista
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Vadim Plessky
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Boris Zbarsky
• default style sheets Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Vadim Plessky
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Anonymous text box creation (Trying again :) Sigurd Lerstad

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Neil Carson

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Vadim Plessky
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] ValerieGSharp
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: CSS Namespace enhancements w3c working draft 25 june 1999 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Rijk van Geijtenbeek
• CSS Namespace enhancements w3c working draft 25 june 1999 Nicolas Leroux
• Re: position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Andy
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Andy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni
• position: fixed [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Vadim Plessky
• Re: Is there a way... Vadim Plessky
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Vadim Plessky
• {display: inline-block } example, screenshot [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Vadim Plessky
• centering blocks vertically Vadim Plessky
• comment on CSS3 Box Model [Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?] Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: Browse Button Charles Matner

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• IE 6.0 cannot handle Japanese yet MURATA Makoto
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Vadim Plessky
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? L. David Baron
• Re: Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Vadim Plessky
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Nolan Clark
• Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Andrew McFarland

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Dylan Schiemann
• RE: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jeffrey Yasskin

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky
• Re:RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Andy
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Dylan Schiemann
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jesse McCarthy
• RE: Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Andy
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re:Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Proposal for non-normative example section (Was: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system?) Jeffrey Yasskin
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Boris Zbarsky
• FW: RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Chris Casciano
• Re:RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Chris Casciano
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Sampo Syreeni
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• RE: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? John-Paul Walton
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Chris Casciano
• FW: Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? John-Paul Walton
• New spec published: CSS Mobile Profile Candidate Recommendation Bert Bos
• Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Andrew McFarland
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Andrew McFarland
• Re:Re: How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• How is it possible to devise such a feeble system? Jesse McCarthy
• (fwd) Announce: Media dependent stylesheet browser conformance guide Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 23 October 2001

• Anonymous text box creation Sigurd Lerstad
• Re: Browse Button Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Browse Button Aaron Starner
• Re: Browse Button Clover Andrew
• Re: CSStbl1.gif in CSS Level 2 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: CSStbl1.gif in CSS Level 2 L. David Baron
• CSStbl1.gif in CSS Level 2 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Browse Button Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 22 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 23 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky

Monday, 22 October 2001

• RE: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Chris Wilson
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 23 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky

Monday, 22 October 2001

• RE: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Chris Wilson

Sunday, 21 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Tantek Celik

Saturday, 20 October 2001

• Language Identification in XML/XHTML/CSS Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Whitespace control for generated content Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 19 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Dylan Schiemann
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky

Thursday, 18 October 2001

• need help- list style type for Ethiopian/Eritrean Languages Yung-Fong Tang

Friday, 19 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky
• Re: :target pseudo-class vs. XPointer Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Dylan Schiemann
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky

Thursday, 18 October 2001

• :target pseudo-class vs. XPointer Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Tantek Celik
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Tantek Celik

Wednesday, 17 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Stuart Ballard
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Tantek Celik

Thursday, 18 October 2001

• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 17 October 2001

• Re: list style suggestion Bert Bos
• Re: CSS3: margins Bert Bos
• Re: list style suggestion Stuart Ballard
• Re: list style suggestion Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: CSS3: margins Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 16 October 2001

• Re: list style suggestion Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: @charset rules Bjoern Hoehrmann
• @charset rules Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 15 October 2001

• Re: How to acheive a nav bar without tables. Ben Freedman

Sunday, 14 October 2001

• Re: CSS books John Buell
• Re: CSS books Ian Hickson
• CSS3: margins fantasai

Thursday, 11 October 2001

• Re: How to acheive a nav bar without tables. John Snelson
• Re: How to acheive a nav bar without tables. John Snelson
• Re: How to acheive a nav bar without tables. Dave Raggett
• How to acheive a nav bar without tables. John Snelson

Wednesday, 10 October 2001

• Re: Background-Quantity and Background-Spacing Properties to CSS3 Jens Müller
• list style suggestion Hoyt, Phil

Tuesday, 9 October 2001

• Background-Quantity and Background-Spacing Properties to CSS3 Juan Fabian
• Re: Background Properties to CSS3 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Background Properties to CSS3 Andy
• RE: Background Properties to CSS3 Rowland Shaw
• "inline" elements in CSS2 box model, and "inline-block" in CSS3 Vadim Plessky

Monday, 8 October 2001

• Re: Background Properties to CSS3 Andy
• Re: Background Properties to CSS3 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Escapes in CSS identifiers are equivalent? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XSLT: Multiple Output Documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: style and the cursor Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 6 October 2001

• style and the cursor McDouglas
• XSLT: Multiple Output Documents Jeffrey Yasskin

Sunday, 7 October 2001

• Background Properties to CSS3 Juan Fabian

Thursday, 4 October 2001

• Re: box-shadow)ext-shadow', 'box-shadow', and 'font-effect' (was Re: Proposal: box-shadow) Chris Lilley
• Re: syntax questions, !important and rect Peter S. Linss
• Escapes in CSS identifiers are equivalent? Etan Wexler
• box-shadow)ext-shadow', 'box-shadow', and 'font-effect' (was Re: Proposal: box-shadow) Etan Wexler
• Re: syntax questions, !important and rect Boris Zbarsky
• syntax questions, !important and rect todd fahrner
• possible bug found in W3C CSS Validation Service? Tommi Lahtonen

Wednesday, 3 October 2001

• CSS3-box: Small stuff fantasai
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation Tantek Celik
• RE: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Zoltan Hawryluk
• Re: CSS2 'text-shadow' Sigurd Lerstad
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Jens Müller
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Andy
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] James Aylard

Tuesday, 2 October 2001

• RE: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Zoltan Hawryluk

Wednesday, 3 October 2001

• Re: CSS2 erratum: 'text-shadow' value definition fantasai

Tuesday, 2 October 2001

• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] fantasai
• Re: CSS2 erratum: 'text-shadow' value definition Ian Hickson
• CSS2 erratum: 'text-shadow' value definition Etan Wexler
• Re: Proposal: box-shadow Chris Lilley
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] James Aylard
• Re: Proposal: box-shadow Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Proposal: list-item-color Etan Wexler
• Re: Comments on WD-css3-background-20010924 Etan Wexler
• Re: Another approch to style hyperlinks Etan Wexler
• Re: Proposal: box-shadow Etan Wexler
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Etan Wexler
• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Etan Wexler

Monday, 1 October 2001

• Re: Scrollbar CSS representation [Re: Proposal] Chris Lilley
• Re: Proposal: list-item-color Dylan Schiemann
• Re: Proposal: list-item-color Daniel Glazman
• Re: ??? Daniel BODEA
• Re: ??? Bert Bos
• RE: The "display" property Aaron L. Patterson
• Re: The "display" property Daniel BODEA
• RE: The "display" property Manos Batsis
• RE: The "display" property Rowland Shaw
• Re: The "display" property Daniel BODEA
• RE: The "display" property Rowland Shaw

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 15:11:04 UTC